This raises the question of whether attention is being allocated chiefly by suddenness and available images rather than by the scale of human need. Colombia’s earthquake is plainly urgent and newly unfolding, but its 23 articles in 24 hours contrast with three for DRC Ebola and none for Sudan, against Sudan’s 0.9-per-day recent baseline. Could that gap affect humanitarian pressure, funding, or public understanding? Perhaps—but coverage counts measure articles and feeds, not care, resources, or independent reporting capacity. Gaza’s continuing prominence may reflect visible disagreement between leaders rather than new conditions for civilians. Simultaneous crises in Colombia, Ukraine, the Middle East, and Africa do not establish a shared causal pattern; most have distinct drivers and should be assessed on their own evidence.